C’mon, who doesn’t like to see a public spat? There’s something magically taboo about that we often don’t see in public and that’s why it’s so juicy. And, hey, it’s even better when it’s corporations having a go at each other’s virtual throats, which this subreddit is celebrating on the daily with screenshots and posts showing just how toasty it gets. Some might be of the opinion that bad publicity is better than no publicity, but there’s a whole discussion of how that’s not always the case and where it can go south really quickly. The other argument is that publicity is one thing, but reputation is a whole other can of beans. The purpose of PR is to manage a company’s reputation. That is done through good relationships with the public. So, good PR would mean that a given company has a positive reputation that reflects what it stands for. Now, you might have noticed previously the not always the case part when explaining how bad publicity is better than none. There are anomalies. A good example of this is Elon Musk. His posts on X have great influence over Tesla stock prices. Heck, their fatal car autopilot crashes and the Cybertruck window failure were also a testament to how detrimental these things can be to a company’s value. But, with that said, sometimes it won’t matter and the company will continue to increase in value despite it. With that said, what are your thoughts on any of this? Share your beefy comments in the comment section below! Oh, and check out some of Wendy’s roasts. You won’t be disappointed. Follow Bored Panda on Google News! Follow us on Flipboard.com/@boredpanda! Please use high-res photos without watermarks Ooops! Your image is too large, maximum file size is 8 MB.
